Author: Hans Christian Lykke
Date: 05:16:45 08/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 1998 at 07:28:29, fca wrote: >On August 23, 1998 at 19:44:09, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On August 23, 1998 at 16:24:37, Ilya P. Kozachenko wrote: > >>>K6-233: >>>F5 - Qxe7 after 1 hour and 14th ply >>>Virtual Chess II - Qxe7 after 1 hour and 266.000.000 nodes seen >>>Hiarcs - not found after 1 hour also... > >For "Qxe7" I take it was meant "Qxg7" ??? > >N98, CG3/5, R9, CM5xxx, J in F, even given much more time, also fail to avoid >grabbing that loose pawn. > >>>>On my P200MMX 64MB Gandalf 3.0 is playing Qe2 af 7 min. 32. sec. >>>>with the score 0.30 for white! > >But the question is: WHY does it reject Qxg7. > >i.e. given say 1 hr/move, playing for both sides, what line and evaluations (for >each move) does it produce after Qxg7 is played ? > >>>Is Gandalf the best PC Chess Program ? :) > >>please no smiley ! Don't underestimate Gandalf. > >To estimate Gandalf we need the answer to the question. > >If the answer suggests it is simply because open lines to the castled king are >given a big no-no in the static evaluation, then I may be able to produce >positions where Gandalf **should** grab a pawn (or similar) but does not do so. > >Please do reply! I will check that Venlig hilsen Hans Christian Lykke > >Kind regards > >fca
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.