Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "I hope the GM doesnt get the program before the match", means >

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:29:10 09/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 21, 2002 at 13:00:05, K. Burcham wrote:

>
>
>when I first learned that this statement is used and accepted often, I had to
>laugh.
>when anyone makes this statement, they are admitting that programs have enough
>problems that if a GM has the program before the match, that these problems can
>be discovered, and used during the match to play for the win.

I think the _reason_ for this statement is not that the programs have a lot
of weaknesses, which they actually do.  Rather it is because the programs are
helpless to "learn" anything on their own and once a weakness is found, the
program will be helpless against that particular "plan".

Programs will _always_ have significant weaknesses.  The hope is that one
day they will be able to recognize a weakness, once it causes a problem, and
then somehow modify itself so that it won't fall for the same thing twice.

I think _that_ is the issue here...

As I have said thousands of times, computers and humans are simply so different
in how they play the game, there is _no_ way to compare them in any manner,
other than in OTB games...  And even that can be "tainted" because of the
machines lack of learning.




>I find this amusing.
>I would give Kramnik 25 copies of the program on the hardware that will be used
>during the match. Then let Kramnik play to what he thinks he has discovered is
>the program's weakness. Then the programmer can go back and try to improve the
>program.
>"I have weaknesses in my program that in the last ten years I have not been able
>to improve on". "So I would like to fool everyone in believing that my program
>can beat the GM by not letting him play my program before the match".
>
>I think everyone here understands why some say this. I just think that those who
>have been taught to think this is the way it should be,are incorrect.
>
>In early developement stages in 70's, 80's, etc., I can understand why some
>would say this, many blunders and mistakes back then. Sometime we will see the
>day that these people will not say this anymore. Maybe too early to expect this
>for now.
>
>kburcham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.