Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 03:01:53 09/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
Yeah well its your choice, as it is clearly your choice to "overstate" the outcome. Sorry, I just don't belive that someone wrote a new engine that is the best one out. Not a chance in hell. Maybe the best amateur/non commercial is *possible* but HIGHLY unlikley. This whole thing smells like a hoax and I will treat is as such until such time as I see this wonderful piece of vaporware with my own eyes. JW On September 22, 2002 at 04:52:19, Christian Koch wrote: >Hi, > >what is your problem? The timecontrols I use for testing is my choice. > >see my posting below >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?253108 > > >On September 22, 2002 at 04:26:43, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On September 22, 2002 at 03:16:39, Christian Koch wrote: >> >>>Here some new results with Ruffian 0.7.6 >>> >>>Athlon 1.4 >>>1024 MB RAM >>>all engines with own books, 64 MB hashtables, ponder = off, all 4men tablebases. >>>40 moves in 10 minutes >>> >>>Ruffian 0.7.6 - Fritz 7 = 9.5 - 4.5 >>> >><snip> >> >>okay, it's enough: 7.5-2.5 against Shredder and 9.5-4.5 against Fritz. Either >>stop posting these results or do a serious test with long timecontrols and >>enough games (>100). >> >>This mythical Ruffian makes us all crazy ;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.