Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Do I have a Right to a Backup Copy?

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 03:48:26 09/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


your message did me think about this old cracking method , where technology
meets marker pen :o) :

http://digitalmass.boston.com/news/2002/05/20/copy_proof_cds.html


On September 21, 2002 at 23:46:16, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On September 21, 2002 at 23:04:05, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>This is a very sticky situation. You DO have a legal right to make a backup
>>copy. Conversely, the program publishers have a right to (attempt to) prevent
>>piracy, and this is usually done by adding copy protection to the CDs.
>
>A lot of good the copy protection did. It took me 15 seconds to find it on a
>file sharing program.
>
>The ONLY people your company is hurting are the ones who legitimately purchase
>the software and who lack the knowledge needed to bypass the copy protection. No
>matter how advanced, complex, and intricate the copy protection is, there's
>always some person out there who is talented enough to break it in a relatively
>short period of time, and it only takes one person to do that and share it on
>some file sharing program, and it's loose.
>
>That will happen regardless of the copy protection. So the copy protection does
>absolutely nothing to prevent that. So what effects of the copy protection are
>left if it does nothing to prevent piracy? It means that the good people who buy
>the software and try to do a CD copy with their standard CD burning software get
>screwed. Lose your CD? Sorry, buy a new one, or you could download it from the
>guy who cracked the useless copy protection a day after it was out.
>
>There are people who just want to see if they can break the copy protection,
>others want to "screw the profiteers", and there are even online cracking groups
>who compete to see who can crack this kind of stuff the fastest (it's not a
>matter of if they can, pretty much whether or not they can do it in a matter of
>hours, or if it will take them more than a day).
>
>This is the same stupid logic that people who say we should take away all of the
>guns use. The bad guys don't get their guns from Walmart, but someone gets shot
>by a gang member and then everyone waves their hands in the air and wants to
>take away all of the guns. Then the bad guys continue getting their supply of
>sub-machine guns on the black market and the situation is worse than it was
>originally because no one thought about the effects of the decision.
>
>>This fight is well over 10 years old, and I don't expect it will ever truly end.
>
>If "this fight" is chessmaster specific, ok. But this issue is a lot older than
>10 years.
>
>>Anybody remember some games that were put on floppies that had actual physical
>>deformities (bad sectors, or even pinpoint holes!) built into the floppies so
>>they could not be copied?
>
>Too young, but I read about it in books. Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately?)
>that didn't work, just like the CM9000 CD protection didn't work.
>
>Russell



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.