Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I don't believe that Ruffian is a new engine

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 03:49:30 09/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 22, 2002 at 02:13:47, Peter Skinner wrote:

>On September 21, 2002 at 14:58:11, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On September 21, 2002 at 10:59:04, Daniel Clausen wrote:
>>
>>>On September 21, 2002 at 10:30:10, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>>I have a sinking feeling here that I am _not_ going to be the one that is
>>>>going to look foolish.
>>>
>>>Being sceptic about something because one doesn't have enough information and
>>>later see the proof it _is_ a new engine doesn't make you look foolish. (that's
>>>how science works by the way) Pretending to know something for sure (like that
>>>someone's cheating) without evidence and later be proven wrong does.
>>>
>>>Bob won't look foolish, however the Ruffian story turns out. You on the other
>>>hand might.
>>
>>
>>You're right Dr. Hyatt won't look foolish regardless how it turns out. I'm also
>>not so sure Peter will, he wrote what I believe many think and have implied. He
>>though had more courage then many by stating it exactly.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>Thanks Sarah,
>
>I believe that is true. I wrote what surely others are thinking. I do not beat
>around the bush as they say. This is how I see it:
>
>A) We know _nothing_ about the author of this program. And I mean nothing.
>B) It's results are _to good_ for it to be a _new_ program.
>C) No previous results have ever been made public. Surely if the author was even
>scoring 50% against any commercial product we would have heard about it sooner.
>Currently it is scoring well above that.
>D) Trying to get information is like pulling teeth. No one can readily get
>information other than results.
>E) The author has not come forward to explain anything. Anyone that gets accused
>here of anything almost immediately comes forward to clear the air. This has not
>happened. Personally I don't think it will.
>
>There is simply to much doubt for me to believe that this is a _new_ program.
>Nor do I believe it is an original program. Possibly someone from this board can
>answer a few questions for me:
>
>1) What is the book format?
>2) How are the engine parameters set? Are they in an ini file?
>3) When executing the file, what does it say in the DOS window?
>4) What was the earliest date that Ruffian had any public results?
>
>I think those should be simple to answer. Hopefully someone can post answers.

Easy answer, WAIT and look ...

Best
Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.