Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bad message ...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 04:28:01 09/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 22, 2002 at 07:14:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>On September 22, 2002 at 07:05:46, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On September 22, 2002 at 06:52:18, Victor Fernandez wrote:
>>
>>You give no new information about Ruffian.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Hi Uri,
>
>where is your problem with a work from an other programmer.
>The Ruffian programmer say not ... please stop to write about "Movai".
>
>Bad message Uri, very bad message!
>
>Best
>Frank

I did not say not to write about Ruffian.

My complain was that the title says more about ruffian and I get no more
information from reading the content.

The fact that it has good result is not new so the speculation that top
programmers will work harder is not surprising(I am not sure about it because
they may also give up chess).

The claim that Ruffian is not bad in endgame is also speculation(I do not know
what bad means but people can look at the games and decide)_

It is not new information.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.