Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:33:39 08/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 1998 at 07:28:29, fca wrote: >But the question is: WHY does it reject Qxg7. Some programs see that taking g7 is a bad move because it weakens the white position. A typical zugzwang game :-)) In paderborn the zugzwang-queen was also travelling on b2 and tiger tried to hunt it... The game itself can bring tears in your eyes, because it shows the difference between search and knowledge very dramatically. You cannot SUBSTITUTE "do not play Qxg7" by search. Zarkov has king-safety terms... It gives up Qxg7 arround 4' on my 200 Mhz machine.... Other programs, depending on how much knowledge they have, and how many NPS they make, will also see it... >i.e. given say 1 hr/move, playing for both sides, what line and evaluations (for >each move) does it produce after Qxg7 is played ? What has happened in the game ! what is your problem?! >To estimate Gandalf we need the answer to the question. no - to estimate gandalf you have to have made experience and you would have to have seen games live. I have seen those games live, and i can guaranty you: it knows about king-safety and these things (see paderborn tiger-gandalf)... >fca
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.