Author: Chessfun
Date: 18:41:20 09/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2002 at 20:08:30, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Chessfun's games tell us that CT 15 is probably better than CT 14. They are >really too small a sample for any conclusions as to real strength. We thank her >for her efforts. > >Tim Not sure exactly why they choose to post my results, there were/are many others. In my case I simply played 10 against each and stopped. There are also many other results from other engine parameters other than the normal Tiger 15 which those figures represent. As for sample size naturally the reader can conclude whatever they wish, but we had Tiger 15 in beta testing for 3 months. Quickly checking specifically these two engines J7 and J6 others posted the following scores in total all games autoplayed; Chess Tiger 15 normal vs Junior 7 G/60 min 22.5-11.5 40/60 min 12.5-5.5 40/40 min 8.0-4.0 Chess Tiger 15 (normal) vs Junior 6 40/40 min 13.0-9.0 In the specific case of Junior 7 though I did happen to play another 7 games at 60 mins autoplayed within the last week the score was +3 -2 =2 in favor of Tiger 15. But it wouldn't seem so odd IMO in this case as the SSDF had similar results with Tiger 14. This was Tiger 14's score at the SSDF against Junior 7. Junior7 A1200 26-14 While against Junior 6a they had; Junior6 K6450 19½-20½ Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.