Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ruffian position

Author: Chessfun

Date: 11:06:14 09/23/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 23, 2002 at 13:44:43, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>On September 23, 2002 at 12:59:39, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On September 23, 2002 at 12:55:21, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>
>>>On September 23, 2002 at 12:50:28, Chessfun wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 23, 2002 at 12:40:46, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On September 23, 2002 at 12:33:52, Chessfun wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On September 23, 2002 at 12:31:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On September 23, 2002 at 12:28:14, Chessfun wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi Sarah,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>is Tiger 15 compatible to standards (UCI, WB).
>>>>>>>Where can I donwload it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think you missed a ;-) on the end Frank not a ?, else I'd simply think you
>>>>>>were trying to be smart.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sarah.
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>yes, yes only a joke!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'm still wondering why the need for the comment?. The original poster asked
>>>>what CT and Fritz made of it so I posted an analysis. If you want to post your
>>>>questions about Tiger 15 as a separate subject, fine with me.
>>>>
>>>>Sarah.
>>>
>>>Hi Sarah,
>>>
>>>thanks for this comment.
>>>And now you can wonder about the Ruffian post in the past here.
>>
>>
>>Please be specific Frank and I'll try to answer your question.
>>
>>
>>>Good example, or?
>>
>>
>>See above.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>Hi,
>
>read the ruffian threads from the last days!
>Enough ...


Not really, still have no clue of how any of that applies here...oh well.


Sarah.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.