Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:06:27 09/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2002 at 16:31:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 23, 2002 at 15:28:15, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On September 23, 2002 at 15:20:49, George Sobala wrote: >> >>>On September 23, 2002 at 15:18:35, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>1. I don't think it is a hoax. >>>>2. I don't think it is a clone. >>>>3. I think the author is to be congratulated. >>> >>>I think you are probably right, assuming that you refer to Ruffian. >>> >>>BTW it's not Fritz7 or Shredder 6.02 (they have completely different evals when >>>analyzing side by side.) >> >>I am pretty good at recognizing clones. At least 1/4 of all Winboard engines >>are a clone of something (mostly TSCP). > >It may be interesting to have a list of the known clones. Probably half of them openly say that they are modified versions of whatever. The others are less open about it. There are a few that have boldly proclaimed to be a totally new engine. It is actually pretty easy to find out most of the time. If you have the program strings.exe, you can often quickly find out for yourself.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.