Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:06:36 09/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 2002 at 16:01:38, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On September 23, 2002 at 15:36:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 23, 2002 at 14:43:23, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >> >>>On September 23, 2002 at 14:19:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>2. A copy of a commercial engine, aided by a hex editor to change strings >>>> to disguise what has happened. >>> >>>The only commercial engine, that I am aware of, that supports UCI and WB is >>>Gandalf. AFAIK it is not available for Unix systems. Ruffian, when logged into >>>ICC shows an interface line with xboard. Unix versions are expected soon. >>> >>>>5. A completely new program, developed by a completely new author, sight- >>>> unseen by anybody until very recently. >>> >>>I think, point 5 is by far the most probable thing. >> >>We just have to agree to disagree. I believe it is the _least_ probable >>explanation. > >If you believe this, you believe, your point 2 is more probable. Have you any >explaination, how this can be, after reading my argument? > >Regards, >Dieter I don't know enough about windows. But I could _sure_ write a "wrapper" program for a unix application that talked one or the other, and make it appear to "talk" both... So I don't see that as an iron-clad refutation... Someone with more windows experience than me would have to say "this is impossible." In unix it clearly is not.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.