Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More Ruffian v Gambit Tiger II

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 06:04:57 09/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 24, 2002 at 07:56:09, Shaun Brewer wrote:

Writing a strong engine without anybody knowing about it; writing a strong book
isn't easy; program emphases on fast searching to find tactical shots.

That sounds like a pro with spare time. Anybody seen Lang lately ?

Tony

>Okay I have run some more games since yesterday.
>
>As before PIII 1333mhz 512 ram
>
>This time game in 5 min
>
>Individual statistics:
>
>(1) Ruffian 1.0.0             :  20 (+ 13,=  3,-  4), 72.5 %
>(2) Gambit Tiger 2.0          :  20 (+  4,=  3,- 13), 27.5 %
>
>However from the nunn positions with no books, note I renamed the Ruffian book
>to prevent its use.
>
>Individual statistics:
>
>(1) Gambit Tiger 2.0          :  20 (+  9,=  6,-  5), 60.0 %
>(2) Ruffian 1.0.0             :  20 (+  5,=  6,-  9), 40.0 %
>
>So far it is looking to me as if Ruffian is a good engine with a better book.
>
>
>On my Tbird 850 512mb ram game in 15 minutes (50 game match results so far)
>
>Individual statistics:
>
>(1) Ruffian 1.0.0             :  31 (+ 13,= 10,-  8), 58.1 %
>(2) Gambit Tiger 2.0          :  31 (+  8,= 10,- 13), 41.9 %
>
>Once this is finished I will run the nunn positions and if someone can post the
>nunn2 positions I will add these too (assuming they are additional not just a
>couple of extra positions).
>
>My test with Ruffian v Crafty 18.15 at 40 in 60 minutes is at game 5 I will wait
>until 16 + games before reporting.
>
>All the best
>
>Shaun



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.