Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:43:03 09/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2002 at 17:20:44, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>There _are_ differences. Let's take Tamerlane and Fritz. I agree with your >>respect for the programmer of Tamerlane but it doesn't make sense to claim that >>they represent the same kind of quality IMHO. > >Sorry Peter, no different for me. >MFChess or Fritz, engine is engine! We have to agree to disagree on this one. >>But why would anyone want to do that? If you bought a commercial full-featured >>GUI where you can use all your beloved engines - why would you want to use them >>is another inferior GUI ? I agree to the exception of the ChessBase GUIs when it >>is about their miserable WinBoard support. But if you owned say Shredder and >>wanted to use UCI engines and you are no part of another development team - do >>you really think you would be much interested to run them in say Arena? > >Please speak not from Arena. >I know Martin Blume since end of the year 2001. >I wrote the same now 4 years. >This have not to do with Arena, not very nice what you write Peter. > >Inferior GUI? >What is a inferior GUI, please give me an example? I think that Arena is inferior to costy commercial GUIs. This is not about being nice or being evil, it's about the truth. OK - and I'll bite for once. You don't really say the same for 4 years now at all. Even last year you still wrote that you thought UCI engines shouldn't be availlable for free at all but only as a commercial product - you changed your opinion later .. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.