Author: Peter Berger
Date: 21:00:14 09/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2002 at 18:02:57, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On September 24, 2002 at 17:43:03, Peter Berger wrote: > >Hi, > >>I think that Arena is inferior to costy commercial GUIs. This is not about being nice or being evil, it's about the truth. > >I would never say to a program it's "inferior". I wouldn't either :), I simply mixed up my vobabulary. I thought inferior was the opposite to superior - this doesn't seem to be the case. But yes, I think that Arena can't compete with commercial GUIs on same grounds, and why should it? > >>OK - and I'll bite for once. You don't really say the same for 4 years now at >>all. Even last year you still wrote that you thought UCI engines shouldn't be >>availlable for free at all but only as a commercial product - you changed your >>opinion later .. > >This is completely false! It it? http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/15208.htm Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.