Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:26:35 08/27/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 1998 at 17:55:10, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>In this respect remember that stage-two is much faster than stage-one. >>>In stage-one all moves have to be searched. In stage-two only the "move >>>played in the game" has to be searched till the given depth from stage-one. >>>Stage-two is simply done by an internal "analysis include". As you know >>>such a search is usually 3-5 times faster. So the real time gain is not much. >>>But I assume that is not a good answer :) > >>I haven't seen a much different eval yet and I can't remember getting Rebel at >>least one ply deeper when only analyzing the played move. > >That's the point, an analysis with unequal ply-depth's is pretty worthless so >that's why stage-two searches as deep as stage-one for a good comparison. But ply+1 should give a more accurate eval, right? >>That is indeed confusing. It should be possible to let Rebel analyze all the >>games of a database like he does with the loaded game in "analyze game". > >Easy, select all games from the database (button select all) or select just >a few with the mouse then go to the "utilities" menu and select "analyze >game". That's it as Rebel will analyze all games you selected. >- Ed - Aha, that is easy...interesting.... ;-) OK, I still have to learn. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.