Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:53:11 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2002 at 17:52:19, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:
I wrote too much text again, sorry for that,
but the 3 crucial lines were:
>The problem is i can't use pthread_cond_wait, because
>it's not only an i/o thread that has to get signalled, but
>several other processes must be able to do it too...
obviously i can't use any of the pthread_ calls like Bob explained.
If threads according to Nalimov are so much the same like a process,
i don't see why all the unix OSes do not have the same functions working
for processes...
>On September 25, 2002 at 07:48:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I'm looking to a quick alternative for the windows
>>function WaitForSingleObject();
>
>I think that you are looking for
>pthread_join();
>
>That is what I use and it works exactly the same.
>
>I use this in windows:
>
>static void engine_thread_wait(void)
>{
> WaitForSingleObject (Engine_ID, INFINITE);
>}
>
>And the equivalent in Linux:
>
>static void engine_thread_wait(void)
>{
> void *p;
> pthread_join (Engine_ID, &p);
>}
>
>Regards,
>Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.