Author: pavel
Date: 04:59:24 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 25, 2002 at 22:16:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>Sune, >> I still think some of the reactions has more to do with jealousy than >>sketicism. I mean if you look at the speculations (and some accusations) I >>listed in my previous post, and if you think about some of them, you will notice >>how dubiously far-fetched those speculations and accusations are. >> > > > >No jealousy here whatsoever. Just a healthy dose of skepticism, caused by >the old > > "fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me..." Hmmm, First Yace than Ruffian (I am sure I missed few more). So that makes twice, right? ;) > >I've seen _way_ too many "new and wonderful" engines... That turned out to >be neither... > > > > >>I would expect someone to take this is as an example, and work harder to improve >>his engine, not stratch their head and try to find faults that isn't there. >> >>IMO the previous clones were much too obvious, and clones are much too easy to >>catch in general. > > >And you don't think it possible that the "cloners" get more sophisticated? >Or do they remain with their very amateurish attempts forever? > >Get realistic... > :) Bob, I have great respect for you, I hope you don't take offense on some of my posts; none was intended, I just didn't agree with you. So talking about getting realistic, how about some solid data to support those speculations, now that the program is available for everyone to try? cheers, pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.