Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 05:30:52 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2002 at 05:47:24, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On September 26, 2002 at 03:47:45, Yuriy Lyapko wrote: > >>I am surprised very much with a noise lifted after release of the Ruffian. >>For what reason the assumption can appear that it is a clone of some other >>program? >>Because it plays strongly? Where did you saw the sources allowing to create >>something similar in strength? >>Because it is free? Not all is sold. Linux is free. >>Because it came from nowhere? And what about Arena or Galis WBTM? Had anyone >>heard about their authors before release of this products. >>May be, there are any other proofs? If not, let's not envy that someone is >>cleverer than we. >>The first version of the Yace was strong enough too, but nobody accused the >>author in plagiarism. > >I think, the most important difference is that the yace author Dieter is a very >active member of CCC. He is always willing to reply on questions or bug reports >regarding his program. Dieter is also willing to share his wide knowledge about >chess programmming with us. > >The Ruffian author isn't. So there is less info and more room for speculations. > >Of course, we can't expect from every author to be available here. It's his own >decision. > >Uli > Exactly, Uli To discredit Par Ola with wild "clone" speculations is very embarrassing to me. Presumption of innocence is strongly recommend IMHO. If i imagine to develope a chess program surrounded by the great swedish nature... Gerd >> >>I think, the sole problem is that Ruffian is already the competitor to the >>commercial programs and may become even stronger in the future. IMHO, if it were >>sold, there will be no such accusations. >>And if there is an opportunity to receive the good chess program free-of-charge >>what for to pay? >> >>Best regards, >>George
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.