Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 12:34:59 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
Unfortunately I don't have dual P4/2.8, but here are some numbers: Single P4/2GHz: 806k nps Single P4/2.53MHz: 1.07k nps Dual P4/2GHz: 1.48M nps. As you see, P4 scaled better than linearly from 2GHz to 2.53GHz (1.33x when CPU speed up by 1.265x); probably faster memory helped. I estimate that dual P4/2.53GHz will be in the range 1.8-1.9M nps. And dual P4/2.8GHz would be even faster. Thanks, Eugene On September 26, 2002 at 12:28:16, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On September 26, 2002 at 11:16:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> 93.5 seconds base run time >> >>Yes... But the Intel duals are blowing the AMD duals out of the >>water, totally.. >> >>AMD appears to win the "single cpu war" at the moment. But on the >>duals (and beyond) they are _way_ behind intel's performance. > > >Where exactly are you seeing the dual AMD's being "_way_" behind Intel's >dual P4 systems? Slates dual XP 1.73(2100+) gets 1.69 million nodes/sec in >Crafty v18.11. A single 2.5GHz AthlonXP gets almost 1.6 million nodes/second. >With the 2800+ being announced on October 1st and the Iwill MPX2 as cheap as it >is someone could make a dual AthlonXP 2800+ box quite easily provided they take >the 5 minutes to unlock the cpus. > >Show me some numbers Hyatt. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.