Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 12:37:45 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2002 at 15:07:04, Chessfun wrote: >On September 26, 2002 at 14:51:07, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: > >>Athlon XP 1800+, 15m+5s: >> >>Ruffian Gauntlet 2002 >> >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Aristarch 4.4 12.0 - 8.0 >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Deep Fritz 7 6.0 - 14.0 >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Goliath Blitz Classic T173 16.0 - 4.0 >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Hiarcs 8 9.5 - 10.5 >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Chess Tiger 14.0 9.0 - 11.0 >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Junior 7 11.0 - 9.0 >>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Shredder Paderborn 10.0 - 10.0 >> >>Pretty strong, eh? ;-) > >Why use Wb2Uci when Ruffian is native UCI? reason I ask is at least for me there >is a small lag when set as UCI with Wb2Uci not when set as native. > >Sarah. Maybee he is using the CB interface. There is still a bug in Ruffina UCI implementation? Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.