Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:01:30 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2002 at 15:37:45, Torstein Hall wrote: >On September 26, 2002 at 15:07:04, Chessfun wrote: > >>On September 26, 2002 at 14:51:07, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >> >>>Athlon XP 1800+, 15m+5s: >>> >>>Ruffian Gauntlet 2002 >>> >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Aristarch 4.4 12.0 - 8.0 >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Deep Fritz 7 6.0 - 14.0 >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Goliath Blitz Classic T173 16.0 - 4.0 >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Hiarcs 8 9.5 - 10.5 >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Chess Tiger 14.0 9.0 - 11.0 >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Junior 7 11.0 - 9.0 >>>Ruffian 1.0 Wb2UCI - Shredder Paderborn 10.0 - 10.0 >>> >>>Pretty strong, eh? ;-) >> >>Why use Wb2Uci when Ruffian is native UCI? reason I ask is at least for me there >>is a small lag when set as UCI with Wb2Uci not when set as native. >> >>Sarah. > >Maybee he is using the CB interface. There is still a bug in Ruffina UCI >implementation? > >Torstein But that bug is a ponder bug. His tourney was single PC ponder=off assumed. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.