Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:17:32 09/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
[ ] But look at this move! Even though 'X' lost to 'Y', 'X' plays better chess [ ] 'X' lost to 'Y' 4 times in a row and then 'Y' lost to 'X' 5 times! It's rigged! [ ] Program 'Y' needs at least 11 CPU's [ ] The author wasn't present, and so the results are doubtful [ ] The author was present, and this conflict of interest makes the results doubtful [ ] Program 'Y' was clearly using the book of program 'Z' and therefore cheated [ ] I had bugs in my opening book, otherwise my engine would have won. [ ] I had a bug in my evaluation, otherwise my engine would have won. [ ] I had a bug in my EGTB's, otherwise my engine would have won. [ ] I had a bug in my hash table, otherwise my engine would have won. [ ] Program 'Y' won in the past. How can 'X' have won it? It must be wrong Upon further reflection, I am sure that the excuses are uncountable. The only question is the cardinality of the infinity.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.