Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New and final solution of the Monty Hall Dilemma

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 05:54:03 09/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 2002 at 08:43:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On September 27, 2002 at 08:22:06, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On September 27, 2002 at 08:14:28, Gerrit Reubold wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Sune,
>>>
>>>On September 26, 2002 at 14:47:32, Sune Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 25, 2002 at 15:06:58, John Merlino wrote:
>>>>>correct if you switch. The "host" has nothing to do with it, because he/she MUST
>>>>>choose a door to open.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Not entirely correct, the host has got something to do with it. The host must
>>>>KNOW which door hides the car. It is vital that he doesn't open a door to a goat
>>>>by shear luck, because in that case you do not get that 2/3 odds.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I disagree, I am sure it doesn't matter whether the host opens a door (with a
>>>goat) KNOWING where the car is or by SHEAR LUCK. The candidate should switch in
>>>either case, thus improving his winning odds from 1/3 to 2/3. Of course, if the
>>>host doesn't know and opens the door with the car (accidently), the game is over
>>>:-)
>>
>>Ok, well at least we agree that if he KNOWS he should switch.
>>
>>So suppose the host doesn't know, and the host opens a door to a goat.
>>
>>What does this tell us?
>>Well, since he didn't know, it means he either had a 50% probability of opening
>>to a goat, or a 100% probability.
>>
>>He gets 100% probability if we are sitting on the car, and he gets 50% if the
>>car is behind the one of the doors he had to choose from.
>>
>>The odds of picking a goat if you have 100% probability is higher than if you
>>only have 50% (obviously), okay?
>>
>>Thus we now know it is more probable that we did pick the door with the car,
>>because the host was so lucky to pick one with a goat, which is a lot more
>>proabable if he had nothing but goats to choose from.
>>
>
>Err, Sune, is it true that if I, err, sit in two cars, that I should have two
>keys? The problem get's more complicated than expected, I must apologize, but
>what would be your verdict?

I'm not sure I see your point?

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.