Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New and final solution of the Monty Hall Dilemma

Author: Gerrit Reubold

Date: 08:44:29 09/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 2002 at 11:35:22, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On September 27, 2002 at 11:09:41, Gerrit Reubold wrote:
>
>>Perhaps we should play such a game against each other, the one who is right will
>>get rich, the other will get poor :-)
>>
>>Greetings, Gerrit
>
>Gerrit, there is no game at all. There is one single trial. Will you be ready to
>consider now?

A single event is a game, too.

>
>Rolf Tueschen
>
>P.S. In a long serie of many trials, in the end the strategy to always switch is
>the best, right? But not in the single event. There it's 50:50.

Of course I would be willing to play a game with only a single event. I don't
understand why you make a difference between probabilities of single events and
probabilities of events which are in a series of events.

Greetings,
Gerrit



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.