Author: Peter Berger
Date: 12:18:52 09/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2002 at 15:11:12, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 27, 2002 at 14:58:25, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On September 27, 2002 at 14:33:22, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Correction: >>>I meant one and only one of us is right if incredible luck happened. >>>of course in most cases we will discover that both of us wrong. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Read http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?254769 . I am your friend on >>g5 :). >> >>Peter > >I read it and replied it without the friend. >simulation prove that out of 64000 games >only 2000 are practically played and >I win 1000 out of 2000 by not switching. > >With the friend I get the same and I see no reason to prefer a1 and not g5 if I >know that the host does not choose g5. > >If the host choose random squares the game is >practically the same because all the squares are the same >from the host point of view when he knows nothing about them. > >Uri The right assumption IMHO is not that the friend sits on g5 but that the friend always sits on the other field left the host didn't expose. Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.