Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hammers 128bit shifts

Author: Gareth McCaughan

Date: 18:16:33 09/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


Gerd Isenberg wrote (quoting AMD's x86-64 programmer's manual):

> In some implementations, however, PUNPCKHQDQ may be a
> better choice for this operation.

Er, surely that should be

[D] PUNPCKHQDQ

Um, no, doesn't seem to work. Weird. What kind of screwed up
FEN is that, anyway? Must be for one of them funny 10x10
variants with lots of extra pieces.

--
g



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.