Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Monty Hall: The Proof only for trials > n=3

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 06:10:10 09/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 28, 2002 at 08:41:51, Sune Fischer wrote:

>I think it is time to give in, actually it isn't very complicated at all:
>
>Assume the hosts always opens to a goat (by luck or not):
>
>You first pick a car (1/3), you switch and pick a car (0%)
>You first pick a goat (2/3), you switch and pick a car (100%)

First of all you made a mistake.Your firstline should read "pick a goat (0%)".

Now I'll show you my version:

You first pick a car (1/3), you stick and pick a car. (100%)
You first pick a goat (2/3), you stick and pick a goat. (0%)===> 50% in all

You first pick a car, you switch and pick a goat. (0%)
You first pick a goat, you switch and pick a car. (100%) ===> 50 %in all

Where is your problem to understand the 50% for one single trial? The
differences with your added 1/ or 2/3 doesn't matter for the four possible
cases.




>
>So by always switching you get 66.66% chance of a win.

There is no "always". Isn't that clear by now?

There is no way to get a better than 50% chance for 1 trial.

Rolf Tueschen

P.S. I think that all has been said by now and we should leave CCC. It has been
shown how difficult stistics andprobability are and how confusing.




>With N>3 the odds gets even better.
>
>How the host is supposed to "always" pick a goat by shear luck
>is a different question, in fact it seems contradictory to
>you assumption about luck, but if you only run 1 experiment you
>don't have worry about those questions.
>



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.