Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Has Christophe's 0.01% chance actually occurred?

Author: Miguel A. Ballicora

Date: 07:35:48 09/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 2002 at 13:12:50, Sune Larsson wrote:

>On September 27, 2002 at 12:10:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On September 27, 2002 at 11:28:28, Sune Larsson wrote:
>>
>>>On September 26, 2002 at 11:17:40, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 26, 2002 at 08:31:11, Sune Larsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On September 26, 2002 at 07:06:43, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On September 26, 2002 at 06:33:35, Sune Larsson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On September 26, 2002 at 04:31:29, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On September 26, 2002 at 04:05:35, Yuriy Lyapko wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Better commercial ruffian is better than a better free ruffian.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Uri
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Very strange statement. Uri, you have too much money? Windows at $1000 is better
>>>>>>>>>than the same Windows free-of-charge? I really don't understand your point.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>George
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>My point is that a better free ruffian is bad news for all the programmers who
>>>>>>>>think maybe to sell their program in the future unless the author is going to
>>>>>>>>release also the source code but I do not expect the author of Ruffian to do it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I am going to release a better free movei but I do not plan to release a version
>>>>>>>>that is significantly better than all the free programs even if I can develop
>>>>>>>>it(I still hope that I can).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Uri
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aha - in order to go commercial you have to be significantly better than the
>>>>>>> free programs?! And before the line was set by the playing strength showed by
>>>>>>> Yace/Crafty. Now it is Ruffian... So your whole flood of negative arguments
>>>>>>> towards Ruffian (including mentioning virus and distrust of the author since
>>>>>>> he doesn't post on forums) seems to spring from very subjective thoughts,
>>>>>>> feelings and plans of your own... IMO, this is not the way to create respect
>>>>>>> for yourself as a person nor as a chess programmer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /s
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I am not going to post more negatives posts about Ruffian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My suspect was based on the fact that the decision did not seem to me logical
>>>>>>decision but maybe I do not understand and releasing a free program that is
>>>>>>clearly better than the other programs is a better way to make money later from
>>>>>>selling even a better program.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Uri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> People just might have other values in life than "making money" - at least when
>>>>> it comes down to our mutual hobby computerchess. Look at Yace, WinBoard and
>>>>> Scid - products with a very high brand of quality...
>>>>>
>>>>> /s
>>>>
>>>>I never used scid so I will not comment about it.
>>>>
>>>>I believe that the interface of commercial programs is
>>>>superior relative to winboard so I do not think that
>>>>winboard could has a significant commercial value.
>>>>
>>>>Yace0.99.56 is weaker than Ruffian so I also do not think that
>>>>it has big commercial value.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>
>>> How about Arena?
>>>
>>> /s
>>
>>I do not know
>>I never tried it
>>
>>I do not know if it could have a significant commercial value.
>>
>>Uri
>
> Just out of curiosity - how come you never tried Scid and Arena?
> Two excellent pieces of free chess software. If you have databases
> of chess games, some software is needed to manage them. I found that
> SCID has features that not even CB8 has (I use both) - f.e. automatic
> correction of name spelling [player names, events, places etc], automatic
> setting of elos in games, a very effective double checker (finds pesky
> doubles that CB8 misses], an even more sophisticated ECO system etc.
> Arena is just a superb interface for Uci and Wb engines - with the joy
> of national anthems, logos etc.

Some time ago I downloaded Arena and I found it had *lots* of bugs in the
graphical interface. Did it improve? Maybe I should try it again.
That scared me a bit to test an engine in that environment.

SCID is very nice. Is there any way to cut and paste a position? I really need a
replacement for EPD2DIAG in Linux.

Regards,
Miguel


>
> /s



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.