Author: Tina Long
Date: 16:54:56 09/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2002 at 19:43:55, martin fierz wrote: >On September 28, 2002 at 19:21:32, mike schoonover wrote: > >>he agreed to to the time control. If I recall, from previous posts by John M, They initially agreed to play 60moves per 2hours (or 40/120?) but ICC wouldn't/couldn't allow that to happen, so they compromised at 2min/move. Getting bogged down at move 6 is unfortunate, and was cleverly planned by the Fischer personality. <conspiracy theory on> I think it's all rigged. Flog the Alekhine & Botvinnik (sp? sorry) personalities. Get flogged by the Fischer and CMDefault personalities. Sell a few thousand more copies in the USA. That's why we can't get it in Australia. <conspiracy theory off> Wonderful stuff John, Tina Long >yeah, he agreed because he is getting paid to play. he would be stupid to >decline just because of the time control, wouldn't he? easy money... > >>this is a no whining zone. >nope, this is more or less free speech zone. whining is allowed here :-) > >>regards >>mike > >aloha > martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.