Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 08:11:19 09/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2002 at 04:55:40, John Smith wrote: >And according to our laws, with respect to intellectual property, you do not >require a showing of intent to prove criminal liability. In other words, just >being in possesion of the pirated software puts you in a world of hurt. > >How do you think prosecutors here in the USA and overseas get to convict >pedophiles ? The fact that they have images of children in sexually explicit >conduct in their computers, notwithstanding the defense of ignorance, is >evidence of criminal conduct. > >Terry admitted that he had pirated software. That admission, in and of itself, >would be enough to convict him. > >There is no such thing as innocent theft. If you have any software in your >computer that is not distributed as freeware, and you have not paid for it, you >are a thief. End of story. Then you better arrest society! 99.9% of ALL computer users have at least one copied programme! You are calling not just me, but almost everyone who owns or uses a computer a crook! That is just plain stupidity! You're not suppose to tape movies on television either, but almost everyone with a VCR does. This doesn't make them criminals. If you sell, rent, charge admission for, or show these tapes publicly, then you have a case. End of Story!
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.