Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Uri, I am referring to American law, not Israeli or Hebrew law

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 08:11:19 09/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 29, 2002 at 04:55:40, John Smith wrote:

>And according to our laws, with respect to intellectual property, you do not
>require a showing of intent to prove criminal liability.  In other words, just
>being in possesion of the pirated software puts you in a world of hurt.
>
>How do you think prosecutors here in the USA and overseas get to convict
>pedophiles ?  The fact that they have images of children in sexually explicit
>conduct in their computers, notwithstanding the defense of ignorance, is
>evidence of criminal conduct.
>
>Terry admitted that he had pirated software.  That admission, in and of itself,
>would be enough to convict him.
>
>There is no such thing as innocent theft.  If you have any software in your
>computer that is not distributed as freeware, and you have not paid for it, you
>are a thief.  End of story.

Then you better arrest society! 99.9% of ALL computer users have at least one
copied programme!

You are calling not just me, but almost everyone who owns or uses a computer a
crook!

That is just plain stupidity!


You're not suppose to tape movies on television either, but almost everyone with
a VCR does.

This doesn't make them criminals. If you sell, rent, charge admission for, or
show these tapes publicly, then you have a case.

End of Story!



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.