Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 03:08:09 09/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
September 27, 2002 at 09:56:30 : http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?254665 no response from John Merlino Sure , it was my opponion, the time control is very strange ... On September 30, 2002 at 05:57:45, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >On September 30, 2002 at 05:33:56, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>On September 30, 2002 at 04:05:19, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>What does the time control 120 + 120 mean? >>>Kurt >> >>It was : 2 min at beginning of the game + 2 min at each move >> >>I don't understand why Larry C accepted this time control... > >Well, i don't understand why you didn't 'pick' on this before the game. The >timecontrol was annonced and explained here several days before the game. >To start this after the game just seems like 'bad loser' attitude. > >I think you have to know a little about the GM in question before decide if this >timecontrol is bad for him. > >The IM who commented on the last game on chess.fm was convinced that this >timecontrol saved the draw for the GM. > >And the game with the rook offer, the critical move was at move 57 and 58, how >much time do you think he could have had with normal timecontrol where it is >only 2-3 moves to next 'new' time. Now he had 9:06 and 10:24. > >Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.