Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 09:26:36 09/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
Wrong. Some P4 optimizations hurt AMD. Thanks, Eugene On September 30, 2002 at 00:09:28, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On September 29, 2002 at 23:31:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I don't know what this means. I have several dozen programs (Crafty >>is only one) that we have run using intel's compiler and gcc, and in >>_every_ case, Intel's compiler is faster. On P2's, on P3's and on >>P4's... Of course I wouldn't use intel's compiler for an AMD chip, >>why would they want to optimize for a competitor's chip??? > >They don't have to optimize specifically for the competitor's chip, as Intel >compiler still produces probably the fastest binaries for AMD machines. Any >general optimizations (P2, P3, and even P4 optimizations (excluding SSE2 stuff >or whatever)) are just as helpful for AMD processors as they are for Intel ones.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.