Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:28:29 09/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2002 at 11:55:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 29, 2002 at 23:55:57, Rick Terry wrote: > >>On September 29, 2002 at 23:16:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 29, 2002 at 16:33:50, Rick Terry wrote: >>> >>>>Is the time control in this Match comparable to 40/2 or to the Current Fide >>>>Standard time control? >>> >>> >>>Not even close... >> >> >> >> I don't think the time control would have made a difference in the results, >>Larry simply pushed too hard in several of the games, where he should have taken >>the draw. > > >I simply didn't like the time control. It was basically "two minutes a >move, period" whichi is not too fast, but it is _way_ different for a GM to >play that way. IE if you watch a GM play, he plays a bunch of moves almost >instantly, but at some point will go into a "deep think" and burn a lot of >time mapping out long-term strategy. This time control prevented that, >which makes it less appealing. only in part of the cases. If the GM plays relatively fast in the opening then he has time for deep think later. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.