Author: Bo Persson
Date: 09:56:58 09/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2002 at 04:29:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 29, 2002 at 18:27:17, Bo Persson wrote: > >>On September 29, 2002 at 18:09:02, Arshad Syed wrote: >> >>>Would bitboards be the best way in which to represent piece positions or would >>>this be inefficient since the current Pentiums use 32 bit architecture. >> >>It is not terribly inefficient, as all Pentiums can execute 2 or 3 instructions >>in parallell. That makes them sort of 64 bit anyway (2 times 32 really :-). >> >>Bo Persson >>bop2@telia.com > >it is terrible inefficient. However knowing that much about a processor to >get fast at it, that's limited to a handful of dudes worldwide. Thank you! :-) >So what >most people go for is to use that what they can cut'n paste and call their >own engine. > >Best regards, >Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.