Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bitboard representation

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 12:51:22 09/30/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 30, 2002 at 15:06:24, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On September 30, 2002 at 05:49:02, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>*) if you use rotated you need large tables, this is assumably cache
>>inefficient, however there has been some interesting posts recently by Gerd and
>>Steffan where everything is done without tables. This could develop into
>>something really interesting in the years to come.
>
>What was the topic of this discussion? I must have missed it. I would like to go
>back and read it, because I'm not a big fan of rotated bitboards :)

Can you say bitboards without rotated? ;)

Maybe Gerd has finally out-assemblered the rotated, if not I'm still 99% this
will happen on the Hammers, go Gerd! ;)

-S.

>Russell



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.