Author: Slater Wold
Date: 14:25:15 09/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
LOL - Please read the whole thread before you attempt to flame. kthx On September 30, 2002 at 12:22:23, john rice wrote: >AMD is not horrible about announcing a chip and then releasing it 3 months >later. The 2400/2600+ is the first time AMD has delayed a release after >announcing it. Any knowledgeable computer user will tell you that Intel is the >king of the "paper launch". They have used the "paper launch" tactic many times >over the last few years to save face when AMD beat them to the punch. The 1Ghz >and 1.13Ghz PIII fiasco are perfect examples of Intel deception tactics. And >they have used it with several P4 launches as well. Next time, please do a >little research before you talk out your *ss. > >On September 30, 2002 at 00:05:40, Slater Wold wrote: > >> >>I got the annoucement in August that the 2600s would be coming out soon. It is >>now September and they are barely rolling out. (As in, several vendors who are >>selling them don't actually have them yet.) AMD is horrible about this. >>Announce a chip, and 3 months later it hits the streets. >> >>I was planning on going the 2x2600 route, I even bought a new mobo. But after >>waiting too long, I decided to spend the money elsewhere. >> >>Kind of glad now too. Maybe in 3 months I will be able to get my hands on a >>2800. Maybe.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.