Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Satistics

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 06:20:08 10/01/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 01, 2002 at 07:38:42, Volker Pittlik wrote:
>Wertungspartie, 60m + 12s
>Maschinenraum, 2002.09.29
>Average Rating: 2253  (Category 1)
>                             Rtng    Score     12   Perf
>---------------------------------------------------------
> 1: Kassandra, Rebel XP v051 2253   1.5 /  2   =1
> 2: Alibaba                     0   0.5 /  2   =0
>---------------------------------------------------------
>2 games: +0 =1 -1

thank you, but i guess
here it must be

+1 =1 -0

the problem with internet games is - as you mentioned - the different hardware.

but i am in a trap.

when i post results /games on my equal hardware i use at home,
people say: oh - you did not post all games, maybe you cheated.

NOW i am playing live.
answer (see kurts posting) again:
you did not post all games, no statistics.

its always the same.

posting PGN data makes no sense in this forum.
because all you get here is someone pissing on you
claiming: you cheated, where are the rest of the games.

this is a game you can never win.

you want to share computerchess with others, but others
only want to piss there problems arround.
instead of enjoying it.

when i see someone posting interesting stuff here,
i read it, i try it out myself, i replay the games.
i am happy.

i really wonder sometimes what other people want from computerchess.

i want fun. and when i see something i like, i want to share this
fun with others.

it seems some people are incapable to be social !



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.