Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GM Christiansen's rook sac is non-forcing.

Author: Jim Monaghan

Date: 19:39:38 10/01/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 01, 2002 at 21:41:34, John Merlino wrote:

In the first position John, the Black rook sacrifice is non-forcing. White does
not have to take it and can instead reply 54.Qb2!? to oppose queens and possibly
take some wood off, and also to at least cover some dark squares which White is
weak on. Black looks like he definitely has the initiative with the more
comfortable position, but it's definitely another matter to prove that his
"attack" will penetrate the White position to convert his edge to the full
point. I played around with the resulting position with various engines and
could find nothing conclusive. Black seems a bit better, but that's about it.
This White queen move becomes important for the analyst, especially if Susan
Polgar believes the position is a Black win after a White acceptance of the rook
sac.

[D] 8/p1p5/Pp1p2nk/1P1Bq1r1/2P1Pp1p/6r1/1Q3RPP/3R3K b - - 0 54

Cheers,
Jim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.