Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:07:47 10/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2002 at 05:41:59, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 02, 2002 at 04:45:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>He said that what matter is to develop the most unusual tastics possible. >>This statement could have been acceptable if the actual 8x MP system and program >>was not given to him before the match, but everybody know that what he will >>actually do is to replay games that he already knows what the outcome will be, >>since he already had plenty of time to play many games specially certain >>openings and he already had played different moves out of the opening to see >>what deep fritz would play etc... >> >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=530 > >The interesting match is the match of kasparov. You must be kidding.:) Kasparov is getting old. That's why he lost his old precision. Against computers Kramnik or take Karpov are much better now. Rolf Tueschen > >I read in the newspaper that the Junior team says that the bad results of >kasparov against humans in world against russia are because of training against >the program and that there are moves in the games when it is clear that they are >result of thinking how to beat the computer but what works against computers is >not a good idea against humans. > >I did not look at the games but it may be interesting to see examples. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.