Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: 8 x 900 MHz - sounds a bit dated!

Author: George Sobala

Date: 04:12:38 10/02/02

On October 02, 2002 at 05:00:41, T. Opas wrote:

>It is Deep Fritz 7, but the version is unclear, because there is an agreement,
>that Kramnik got the same version as used in the match three month before the
>match, means latest on the 4th of july. But the official release of DF7 for
>public was about the 15th of august!
>Hardware should be 8 x 900 MHz Compaq wizh 4 GB RAM.
>
>Best,
> Torsten

So - 8x900MHz? Given the problems of non-linearity between number of processors
and "real" speedup, wouldn't a spanking new dual 2.4 or 2.8GHz P4 be as fast (or
even faster)?

Re: 8 x 900 MHz - sounds a bit dated! Vincent Diepeveen 13:30:28 10/02/02
Re: 8 x 900 MHz - sounds a bit dated! Vincent Diepeveen 13:28:48 10/02/02
Re: It's the fastest available system! Joachim Rang 05:17:39 10/02/02
- Re: It's the fastest available system! Robert Hyatt 08:10:36 10/02/02
  - Re: It's the fastest available system! Joachim Rang 10:49:25 10/02/02
    - Re: It's the fastest available system! Robert Hyatt 12:24:46 10/02/02
      - Re: It's the fastest available system! Joachim Rang 13:39:05 10/02/02
        
        Re: It's the fastest available system! Vincent Diepeveen 13:43:13 10/02/02
Re: 8 x 900 MHz - sounds a bit dated! Sally Weltrop 05:07:49 10/02/02
Re: A Dual 2.8 would be faster than 8x 900 Mhz ! Jorge Pichard 04:41:19 10/02/02
- Re: A Dual 2.8 would be faster than 8x 900 Mhz ! Robert Hyatt 08:11:48 10/02/02
- Re: Never! Joachim Rang 05:21:06 10/02/02
  - Re: Never! Vincent Diepeveen 13:39:28 10/02/02
    - Re: Never! Robert Hyatt 14:30:32 10/02/02
- Re: A Dual 2.8 Ghz would be faster than 8x 900 Mhz ! Jorge Pichard 04:47:45 10/02/02
  - Re: A Dual 2.8 Ghz would be faster than 8x 900 Mhz ! Vincent Diepeveen 13:44:31 10/02/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.