Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Isn't It Similar to Larry's Match With CM9000?

Author: Dana Turnmire

Date: 06:02:06 10/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 02, 2002 at 04:45:06, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>He said that what matter is to develop the most unusual tastics possible.
>This statement could have been acceptable if the actual 8x MP system and program
>was not given to him before the match, but everybody know that what he will
>actually do is to replay games that he already knows what the outcome will be,
>since he already had plenty of time to play many games specially certain
>openings and he already had played different moves out of the opening to see
>what deep fritz would play etc...
>
>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=530

Larry Christiansen had almost a month to study Chessmaster 9000 but it didn't
seem to help him that much.  Since Kramnik doesn't know what openings Fritz will
play how does he have that much more of an advantage than GM Christiansen?  Is
the learning feature overrated in chess programs?  If not would it not prevent
repeat wins by Kramnik?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.