Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:51:31 10/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2002 at 09:46:14, Maurizio De Leo wrote: >On October 02, 2002 at 05:55:39, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On October 01, 2002 at 08:00:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>Obviously the bitboard programs will profit. We can guess from alpha >>>specs that it's about 33% profit. >> >>Really? How can we guess that? What specs? >> >>>A default compile from DIEP at an Itanium2/McKinley for example it is >>>33% faster at it than it is at a K7 at the same clock. >>>That's *very* good. Obviously it's a mixture of Level caches and especially >>>doing bundles of 6 instructions a clock. >> >>What a load of BS. 33% faster than a 1GHz Athlon gives you 1.33GHz Athlon >>performance. How is this "*very* good"? You can get a 1.33GHz Athlon on >>Pricewatch for $52. >> >>-Tom > >But you can't put 8 or 16 athlon 1.33 in a multiprocessor system ! > >Maurizio Not to mention 512 :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.