Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 08:57:17 10/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2002 at 11:42:05, stuart taylor wrote:
>On October 02, 2002 at 08:43:01, robert flesher wrote:
>
>>You have only played 3 games and that is not enough to draw a conclusion on!
>>Look at the results on this forum you will see tiger is plenty strong and
>>STRONGER that this new ruffian. Try the normal setting of Tiger as Christophe
>>states it is the strongest. Better yet post some game in which you beat it! Then
>>we all will be please, However i wont! hold my breath. Cheers~
>
>If in the first 3 games Tiger lost to ruffian, and Tiger seemed not to even have
>claws, then I would NOT say play more. I would say that it is virtual evidence
>either that Tiger is not all that great, or that something else was wrong, in
>this case-I'd think the later.
>
>A strong machine should be seen to be "playing chess", unlike a strong human who
>might just be having a bad day.
>3 games lost, is 100% loss throught three games. And the first 3 games are
>statistically much more substantial than any other 3, even consecutive,
>somewhere later on. (because, why the very first three?).
>S.Taylor
When you have no idea what you are talking about, it's better to shut up I
think.
"The first 3 games are statistically much more substantial than any other 3":
maybe you should go back to school...
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.