Author: Jorge
Date: 11:26:06 10/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2002 at 13:49:54, Marc van Hal wrote: >On October 02, 2002 at 12:48:34, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 02, 2002 at 11:42:05, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>If in the first 3 games Tiger lost to ruffian, and Tiger seemed not to even have >>>claws, then I would NOT say play more. I would say that it is virtual evidence >>>either that Tiger is not all that great, or that something else was wrong, in >>>this case-I'd think the later. >>> >>>A strong machine should be seen to be "playing chess", unlike a strong human who >>>might just be having a bad day. >>>3 games lost, is 100% loss throught three games. And the first 3 games are >>>statistically much more substantial than any other 3, even consecutive, >>>somewhere later on. (because, why the very first three?). >>>S.Taylor >> >>i am having tiger 15 for a long time now. >>i have 2 autoplayer pairs. one 400 and one 1200 pair. >> >>if it would be a loser, i would have seen it. >> >>chessfun has played lots of games too. and the other beta test team. >> >>when i hear/read those kind of posting... i would at first check if >>the machine is right, the programs are installed accurate. >> >>if you e.g. don't increase the hash tables and mix KB with MB tiger >>plays with 48 kilobytes for hash. this is indeed not much and could >>decrease the strength IMO drastically. >> >> >>why don't you believe several different people who have the program for >>many weeks ?? >> >>why do you trust such a post ?? >> >>i never matched ruffian, because when ruffian came out, my testings of >>tiger15 have been ended before. but if you want i can set up 60/60 >>games against ruffian 1.0.1. >> >>if this helps, on both autoplayers. > > > >Ofcourse I want to believe you. >But i must see evidence on my System and not on somebody elses system. > >But seeing the games it played against Ruffian and some against Chessmaster >realy disapointed me >Ofcourse when I get the evidence I will change my vieuw and also will put a >positive revieuw wich I can't do for now. >So ok I admit my curent revieuw might be made to early. >But the reason where my first conclusions and most of all disapointment. > >Marc What was your Hash settings? It is somewhat unlikely that Tiger is beaten by Ruffian 3 in a row. jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.