Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A Dual 2.8 Ghz would be faster than 8x 900 Mhz !

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 13:44:31 10/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 02, 2002 at 07:47:45, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On October 02, 2002 at 07:41:19, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On October 02, 2002 at 07:12:38, George Sobala wrote:
>>
>>>On October 02, 2002 at 05:00:41, T. Opas wrote:
>>>
>>>>It is Deep Fritz 7, but the version is unclear, because there is an agreement,
>>>>that Kramnik got the same version as used in the match three month before the
>>>>match, means latest on the 4th of july. But the official release of DF7 for
>>>>public was about the 15th of august!
>>>>Hardware should be 8 x 900 MHz Compaq wizh 4 GB RAM.
>>>>
>>>>Best,
>>>> Torsten
>>>
>>>So - 8x900MHz? Given the problems of non-linearity between number of processors
>>>and "real" speedup, wouldn't a spanking new dual 2.4 or 2.8GHz P4 be as fast (or
>>>even faster)?
>>
>>
>>I agree that if they can get their hands on a dual 2.8 Ghz it would be a little
>>bit faster than 8x 900Mhz.
>
>PS: Why would they use an old 8x 900 Mhz MP, against the strongest human player,
>unless they are planning to update it just before the match to an 8x 1.6 Ghz
>which are available.
>
>Pichard.

they aren't. they will show up with a dual k7. even if it has a
sticker on it: "8 processor Xeon", then it still is a dual k7 let me
tell you that for sure.

their sponsor just has K7 hardware that's the problem :)





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.