Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:04:18 10/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2002 at 14:57:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 02, 2002 at 14:33:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 02, 2002 at 13:46:22, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On October 01, 2002 at 12:11:26, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>Ok so you are saying now that 2 minutes a move is giving a better >>>play than 3 minutes a move? >> >>I did not say it. >> >>I said that 2 minutes a move can give better play than 120/40 for part of the >>players(not for all of them). > >please say loud into your room that 2 minutes gives better play than >3 minutes of play for 1000 times and then tell me whether you repeat >the same stupid thing for the 1001th time too because you write down A >and keep repeating A, or whether you agree that it really sounds stupid! This is not what I said. 120/40 is not the same of 3 minute per move for players with bad time management and I know that they are players with bad time management. I also did not say that 2 minutes gives better play than 120/40 I only said that it is the case for part of the players. I am not going to continue to reply. If you cannot understand my post then it is not my problem. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.