Author: John Smith
Date: 01:27:27 10/03/02
I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of any particular program. That being said, I have to agree with some posts that state that tiger 15 is weak. In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly gambit 2. My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with tiger 14 or gambit2. I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program. Just my 2 cents. The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.