Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 01:59:21 10/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote:
>I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games
>to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of
>any particular program. That being said, I have to agree with some posts that
>state that tiger 15 is weak.
>
>In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I
>find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly
>gambit 2. My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with
>tiger 14 or gambit2.
>
>I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which
>somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program.
>
>Just my 2 cents.
>
>The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame.
---------------
There must be something wrong with your setup because how do you explain all the
games that Chessfun recently presented showing Tiger 15 #1!!!
Regards,
Terry
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.