Author: James Swafford
Date: 05:06:44 10/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 04:59:21, Terry Ripple wrote: >On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote: > >>I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games >>to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of >>any particular program. That being said, I have to agree with some posts that >>state that tiger 15 is weak. >> >>In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I >>find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly >>gambit 2. My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with >>tiger 14 or gambit2. >> >>I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which >>somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program. >> >>Just my 2 cents. >> >>The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame. >--------------- >There must be something wrong with your setup because how do you explain all the >games that Chessfun recently presented showing Tiger 15 #1!!! Those games were against other programs. John is pitting CT15 against humans (I think). -- James > >Regards, > Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.