Author: Rick Terry
Date: 08:26:19 10/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote: >I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games >to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of >any particular program. That being said, I have to agree with some posts that >state that tiger 15 is weak. > >In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I >find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly >gambit 2. My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with >tiger 14 or gambit2. > >I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which >somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program. > >Just my 2 cents. > >The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame. I don't see what everyone is ttalking about tiger 15 is a monster, i haven't lost a game with it yet
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.